Recent Updates Page 3 RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • jonpape 2:40 pm on January 5, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Cyber Monday   

    CyberModay Marketing Comparison 

    WASHINGTON - NOVEMBER 27:  Consumers shop onli...
    Image by Getty Images via Daylife

    With the 2008 holiday shopping season behind us, it  is important to take a look at key revenue driver’s to focus on growth next year. CyberMonday, the first Monday following Black Friday, has become one of the most influential shopping days of the year for online week retailers. By looking back at how specific affiliates and publishers performed, retailers can better allocate funds to reach a wider range of consumers. by adding and modifying ad spend and commission rates, retailers can position themselves better on publishers websites and incrementally increase sales.

    The following publishers are divided into two groups based on visitor site traffic from compete.com.

    FatWallet, Mahalo, & RetailMeNot

    FatWallet, Mahalo, & RetailMeNot

    FatWallet.com, Mahalo.com, & RetailMeNot.com make up the first group of publishers analyzed. These publishers on average had between 1 million visitors per month. FatWallet had the least number of visitors last year finishing with an average of 2.3 million visitors in November 2008 and year-over-year growth of 14.2%. Mahalo.com finish the year with an average 3.2 million visitors in November 2008 and year-over-year growth of 168%. The big surprise was RetailMeNot.com, which started the year with just over 1 million visitors and finished with over five million visitors per month.  RetailMeNot’s year-over-year growth was 302% in 2008.

    CouponChief, CyberMonday, Dealio, DealTaker, & GottaDeal

    CouponChief, CyberMonday, Dealio, DealTaker, & GottaDeal

    Out of the last five sites analyzed, CouponChief.com, CyberMonday.com, Dealio.com, DealTaker.com, & GottaDeal.com, two of the sites, CyberMonday.com & GottaDeal.com, increased visitor traffic exponentially during the holiday season.  CyberMonday.com, Shop.org’s specialty shopping site, at 1.2 million visitors in November 2007 is only 750,000 visitors in November 2008 a decrease of 38%.  GottaDeal.com, which has less than half a million visitors most of the year, spiked in November 2007 to 1.5 million visitors and again in November 2008 to 1.8 million visitors, an increased of 18.4%.  CouponChief.com, Dealio.com, and DealTaker.com increased sales in November 2007 but growth remain linear.

    CouponChief.com ended the year with approximately 270,000 visitors in November 2008 and a year-over-year decline of 33.6%. Dealio.com had half a million visitors in November 2008 a year-over-year  increase of about 20%. DealTaker.com finished November 2008 with over 1 million visitors and a year-over-year growth 17%.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 5:50 am on January 4, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Amazon, Best Holiday Season Ever 

    Image representing Amazon as depicted in Crunc...
    Image via CrunchBase

    In article in the Los Angeles Times, Amazon.com once again touted its best year ever.  Amazon attributed there high holiday sales to increase in orders.  Orders rose 17% to 6.3 million items, while shipments rose to 5.6 million units, up 44%.  What is missing from Amazons carefully crafted press release is a corresponding revenue amount or average order value. Without these metrics it is difficult to tell how profitable the holiday shopping season was for Amazon.

    In a May 2008, Fortune magazine article, How Jeff Bezos Rules the Retail Space, there’s an interesting graph entitled Building a Retail Powerhouse. The graph shows Amazon’s growth and success throughout their history. It took Amazon six years to finally turn a profit. In 2000 alone, Amazon recorded sales of $2.762 billion and total losses of $1.411 billion. in 2007, sales were $14.815 billion and profit was $476 million.  Any backward slide for Amazon.com’s profitability would be disasterious for a company whose total stock valuation is double Wal-Marts.

    Fortune Article

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 3:38 pm on January 2, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Viral Marketing Basics – Conveying Ideas 

    Image representing Seth Godin as depicted in C...
    Image byhttp://www.prestonlee.com/archives/67

    via CrunchBase

    The basics for conveying a viral Idea from the book, Small is the New Big, by Seth Godin.

    1. 1) The first impression (of the idea) demands further investigation.
    2. 2) They (the audience) already understand the foundation ideas necessary to get the new idea.
    3. 3) They (the audience) trust or respect the sender must invest the time

    For a more detailed analysis of conveying viral ideas, I recommend the book, Made To Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die, by Chip and Dan Heath.

    madetostick.com

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 3:15 pm on January 1, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Online Communities,   

    Traffic Levels for Social Networks for Moms 

    An example of a social network diagram.
    Image via Wikipedia

    Most brand managers and merchants recognize the importance of targeting mothers for consumer household purchases. Web developers have been taking a similar interest in moms and consumer household spending and a wide variety of social networks for moms have begun to appear. Researching social networking sites for moms, I developed a tiered system that divided the social networks based on visitor traffic compiled from compete.com.

    Top Tier: CafeMom.com & BabyCenter.com

    CafeMom & BabyCenter

    CafeMom & BabyCenter

    CafeMom.com & BabyCenter.com are by far the largest social networking sites for mothers. BabyCenter.com has on average 4 million viewers a month. Additionally, BabyCenter.com has seen year-over-year growth 12.7%.  CafeMom.com has an estimated 2 million visitors per month. CafeMom.com has declined in the number of visitors year-over-year by 4.2%.

    Mid Tier: ParentsConnect.com, CircleofMoms.com, & MomJunction.com

    ParentsConnect CircleofMoms MomJunction

    ParentsConnect CircleofMoms MomJunction

    The mid tier is comprised of sites with less than 1 million visitors per month. The largest of these websites, ParentConnect.com, is owned by MTV and sought significant boost in traffic in May 2008. ParentConnect.com had on average 300,000 visitors prior to May and approximately 800,000 visitors after May. ParentConnect.com year-over-year growth is an astonishing 280%.  CircleofMoms.com was launched in September 2008 and has grown 322% month over month with visitors in November 2008 to approximately 561,000 visitors per month.  MomJunction.com had a large spike in traffic in December 2007 to approximately 500,000 visitors but has on average monthly visitors of about 50,000.  MomJunction.com month over month number of visitors is down 23.1% and averages only 34,000.

    Low Tier: Minti.com, MothersClick.com, & Moxie-Moms.com

    Minti, MothersClick, & Moxie-Moms

    Minti, MothersClick, & Moxie-Moms

    Low tier social networking sites for moms are characterized as having under 100,000 visitors per month. The largest of the sites, Minti.com, has on average 55,000 visitors per month with year-over-year growth of 31.5%. Mothersclick.com is another relatively new social networking site for mothers with average monthly visitors under 20,000 and year-over-year growth of 93.9%. Moxie-Moms.com averages about 1000 people a month with year-over-year growth of 95.1%. Moxie-Moms.com is the only subscription-based website on the list.

    While they are very similar to the sites on this list, we did not include mommy blogger sites such as MommyBlogger.com and MomForce.com. I will cover mommy blogger sites in a different post.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 2:35 am on January 1, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alexa Toolbar, Mozilla Firefox   

    Web Merchant Alexa Ranking Score 

    Alexa internet traffic rankings of RxPGonline.
    Image via Wikipedia

    Amazon’s Alexa is a web ranking score determined by users who have downloaded the Alexa Toolbar.  The lower the Alexa ranking, the more traffic a web site receives.  Below is a list of fifteen web merchants and there corresponding Alexa score.  The Alexa score was received using the SEOQuake extension in Firefox.

    Merchant

    Alexa Score

    Amazon 32
    Walmart 191
    Target 227
    Best Buy 245
    Circuit City 447
    Macys 569
    Overstock 635
    JCP 717
    Sears 764
    Costco 920
    HomeDepot 924
    Kohls 955
    QVC 1407
    Kmart 1596
    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 4:13 pm on December 31, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Search Engine Result Page, SEO   

    Google + "Grand Rapids Internet Marketing" = Jon Pape 

    Google SERP page for the query “Grand Rapids Internet Marketing” featuring my URL and my Naymz.com profile as the top links.

    Google Search Engine Result Page

    Google Search Engine Result Page

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 12:44 pm on December 28, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Eric T. Peterson, Web analytics, Web Analytics Demystified   

    List of E-Commerce Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 

    Browswers including Google Chrome - Clicky web...
    Image by adria.richards via Flickr

    From the book Web Analytics Demystified by Eric T. Peterson.  Review the book for detailed descriptions and information.

    • Ratio of New to Returning Visitors
    • Percent New Visitors
    • Page “Stickiness”
    • Referring Domains
    • Search Keywords and Phrases
    • Percent of Visits Under 90 Seconds
    • Key Conversion Rates (not just sales)
    • Average Order Value
    • New & repeat Customer Conversion Rates
    • Sales per Visitor
    • Percent Returning Visitors
    • Customer Retention Rate
    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 6:53 pm on December 24, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Mashable, ,   

    Twitter has Made Dell $1 Million 

    Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...
    Image via CrunchBase

    A recent article on Sphinn.com called Twitter has Made Dell $1 Million in revenue caught my attention.

    When you take into account Dell’s total revenue, the contribution from twittering is negligible.  The development costs and management probably has a high return on investment even though the model isn’t scalable.  Consumers have to choose to follow Dell.  Dell can not interrupt consumers.

    Mashable has an interesting article on Brands on Twitter.  The article boils down to the two strategies that enables a business on Twitter to resonate with users:

    1. 1) Is the conversation on Twitter one-sided? A business should respond to users.
    2. 2) Does the brand have a “personality” (I believe some marketers call this positioning).

    The Mashable article has a nice quote that sums up my position:

    “I think that authentic and transparent personal Twitter accounts – being yourself in an uncontrived way – may indirectly and intimately influence organizational brands, because of the level of trust involved in sharing information with someone over the course of time.”

    David Wallace agrees with pairing a personality with a brand on Twitter and offers some additional suggestions for social marketing on Twitter in his article, Can Twitter be Useful for Business?

    I think the most important thing to remember for a business is that Twitter is an investment in time (maybe more then you anticipate) and to be successful, you are going to have to commit to a long term strategy to reap the benefits.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 2:24 pm on December 23, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Advertising, Facebook, Seth Goldstein,   

    P&G Social Advertising on Facebook 

    Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...
    Image via CrunchBase, source unknown

    The New York Times has a really interesting article, Advertisers Face Hurdles on Social Networking Sites, on Proctor & Gambles social advertising attempts via Facebook.

    Five great take-aways:

    • Seth Goldstein, wrote that a banner ad “is universally disregarded as irrelevant if it’s not ignored entirely.”
    • Businesses still have to rely on either contests or expensive content to attract visitors.
    • Just 3% of internet users would forward advertising information to a friend.
    • Contests that feature user submissions historically has a low response rate.
    • Seth Goldstein  describes a self-perpetuating cycle in social networks: “Advertisers distract users; users ignore advertisers; advertisers distract better; users ignore better.”

    There are two approaches that seem to work on social networks:

    • Advertisers can be more intrusive, but the outcome will not be positive.
    • Advertisers can create genuinely entertaining commercials, but spend ungodly sums to do so.
    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
  • jonpape 12:37 pm on December 22, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Market, , ,   

    Permission Marketing in Two Sentences 

    Image representing Seth Godin as depicted in C...
    Image byhttp://www.prestonlee.com/archives/67

    via CrunchBase

    “The goal is to teach, cajole, and encourage this stranger to become a friend.  And once she becomes a friend, to apply enough focused marketing to create a customer.”

    -Seth Godin, Permission Marketing, pg 63

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel

Videos, Slideshows and Podcasts by Cincopa Wordpress Plugin